<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Derivative Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 15/09/2009: HP PCs to Boot Linux, gNewSense 2.3 Released &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 15/09/2009: HP PCs to Boot Linux, gNewSense 2.3 Released &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/?p=186#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] Derivative Work Last year, RDR books endeavored to publish an unauthorized encyclopedia of all things Harry Potter. Warner Brothers filed suit, and the resulting litigation turned out to be a fascinating fight over the precise contours of copyright law’s “derivative work” right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Derivative Work Last year, RDR books endeavored to publish an unauthorized encyclopedia of all things Harry Potter. Warner Brothers filed suit, and the resulting litigation turned out to be a fascinating fight over the precise contours of copyright law’s “derivative work” right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz (schestowitz) 's status on Tuesday, 15-Sep-09 11:13:13 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz (schestowitz) 's status on Tuesday, 15-Sep-09 11:13:13 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/?p=186#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/" rel="nofollow">http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Do Content Creators Get Control Over Derivative Works? &#124; Geek News and Musings</title>
		<link>http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Do Content Creators Get Control Over Derivative Works? &#124; Geek News and Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/?p=186#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] Lichtman&#8217;s latest IP Colloquium takes on the question of derivative works, mainly discussing the infamous Harry Potter Lexicon reference guide that a judge recently barred [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lichtman&#8217;s latest IP Colloquium takes on the question of derivative works, mainly discussing the infamous Harry Potter Lexicon reference guide that a judge recently barred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Do Content Creators Get Control Over Derivative Works? &#124; The-Informer</title>
		<link>http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Do Content Creators Get Control Over Derivative Works? &#124; The-Informer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/?p=186#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] Lichtman&#8217;s latest IP Colloquium takes on the question of derivative works, mainly discussing the infamous Harry Potter Lexicon reference guide that a judge recently barred [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lichtman&#8217;s latest IP Colloquium takes on the question of derivative works, mainly discussing the infamous Harry Potter Lexicon reference guide that a judge recently barred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Do Content Creators Get Control Over Derivative Works? &#124; dv8-designs</title>
		<link>http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/2009/09/derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Do Content Creators Get Control Over Derivative Works? &#124; dv8-designs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipcolloquium.com/mobile/?p=186#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] Lichtman&#8217;s latest IP Colloquium takes on the question of derivative works, mainly discussing the infamous Harry Potter Lexicon reference guide that a judge recently barred [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lichtman&#8217;s latest IP Colloquium takes on the question of derivative works, mainly discussing the infamous Harry Potter Lexicon reference guide that a judge recently barred [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

